Liberate Public Schools from Government by Lawsuit / Phase Eight |
110 | |||||||||||||||||||
The Struggle Continues Countrywide to End Race-Based Assignments in Public Schools |
||||||||||||||||||||
boundaried) for which there were more applicants than spaces available. When it appeared no substantial changes were going to be made in the proposal following the November 30 hearing, I made one final objection to the plan to be adopted in a Viewpoint entitled Stop Racial Balancing, published January 10, 2000 in the San Diego Daily Transcript. See Appendix 3. In Paragraphs 4 and 5, I illustrate the manner in which the plan retained racial considerations at the same time it proclaimed it was eliminating them:
I then illustrate (para.5, app.3) that if a child of the same age, race and location as Kimberly were to apply under the proposed plan to the same magnet school, she would still have less priority to attend than a child living in a different cluster gerrymandered to promote racial balancing. As to VEEP eligibility, Paragraphs 6 and 7, Appendix 3, I illustrate that under the proposed plan a child able to walk to a neighborhood school could again have less priority to attend that school than a VEEP child, |
||||||||||||||||||||
Carlin | Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District, San Diego Superior Court No. 303800 (1967-1998) San Diego, California |
|||||||||||||||||||
Carlin | Board of Education v. Superior Court, 61 Cal.App.4th 411 (Feb.1998) [conclusion of Carlin v. Board of Education] San Diego, California |
|||||||||||||||||||
— Liberate: Phase 8, pages 102 - 114 — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|