Liberate Public Schools
from Government by Lawsuit  /  Foreword
  
vii
Foreword
Previous Next

The reference to this earlier exercise of judicial power was followed by his protest in that commentary to its present day extension, on grounds beyond those permitted in federal actions, to legislate busing assignments. This power arose in a lawsuit brought by busing proponents before California's highest court in 1976 in a case known as Crawford I.

Thus, we have seen racial assignments of public school children judicially ordered in class actions like Crawford I. At one point in that case the mandatory racial reassignment of over 80,000 Los Angeles first-through ninth-grade students was effectuated for the Fall, 1980 semester by a trial judge opposed by their school board and many parents, whose objections were later found valid by the Supreme Court.

Not only did the Crawford class action have a discriminatory impact upon those unwilling to be subjected to busing, it drew resources from the district which could have been directed toward education. The Los Angeles school district in a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court in its October Term, 1984, stated the nearly one billion dollars' cost of the litigation leading to the Crawford massive busing order:

“During 1969-1981 the Crawford litigation resulted in 26,351 pages of written testimony, 91 witnesses called, 564 documentary exhibits, 29 special writ proceedings taken, and 17 applications for state appellate review.

“The cost to the District of all the foregoing proceedings and the court ordered desegregation plans was in excess of $910,000,000.”

Los Angeles Unified School District, et al. v. Los Angeles NAACP, et al., on Petition for Writ to the Ninth Judicial Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, No. CA-81-5772 (p.9).

And recently ACLU-affiliated counsel, who led in securing the above fall, 1980 court busing order, filed in Superior Court, San Francisco, another class action entitled Williams, et al. v. State of California, et al., as reported on the ACLU Los Angeles website on June 26, 2000:

A statewide class action suit was filed on May 17, 2000 on behalf of California public school children who are deprived of educational opportunities because they attend schools that lack Next
 


Crawford I   Crawford v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.3d 280 (1976)
[related to BustopBoard of Ed., etc.]
Los Angeles, California
 
Bustop Bustop v. Superior Court, 69 C.A. 3d 66 (1977)
Los Angeles, California
 
Crawford II Crawford v. Board of Education, 113 Cal.App.3d 633 (1980)
Los Angeles, California
  
Board of Ed., etc. Board of Ed., etc. v. Superior Court, 448 U.S. 1343 (1980)
Los Angeles, California
  
Crawford III   Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 458 U.S. 527 (1982)
Los Angeles, California
 
  Los Angeles Unified School District v. Los Angeles NAACP,
on Petition for Writ to the Ninth Judicial Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals,
No. CA-81-5772 (October Term, 1984)
Los Angeles, California
 
Williams Williams v. State of California,
Superior Court San Francisco (May 17,2000)
  
  Liberate: Foreword, pages v - ix — Previous Next
  

Liberate Public Schools
from Government by Lawsuit

A Long Pro Bono Struggle
Against Racially Balancing Public School Students
in a Thirty-Year Lawsuit
by Elmer Enstrom, Jr.
  
Contents
A chronological presentation of the 30-year Carlin affirmative action lawsuit:
a legal battle to reassert the "separation of powers" concept
of a republican form of government embodied in our Constitution.
  
© 1998-2006, 2013 Enstrom Foundation www.EnstromFoundation.org Bookmark and Share