Parental Handbook for Local Control of Education / Challenge Five |
69 | |||||||||||||||||||
San Diegans Challenge Perpetual |
||||||||||||||||||||
Groundswell Motion to Discharge Writ of Mandate is Granted, Effective July 1, 1998
On July 28, 1998 Groundswell filed a Motion That Court Issue an Order Discharging as of July 1, 1998 the Writ of Mandate. It recited that the Petition in Mandamus by the Board to the Fourth District Court of Appeal to return the termination date January 1, 2000 had been denied on February 9, 1998, but the writ of mandate remained to be discharged. On August 26, 1998 the Court granted the Motion to Discharge the Writ of Mandate in a manner which did not change the judicial directions as to the Board's integration plan in the Final Order, as is seen from the formal order (filed September 30, 1998):
The Groundswell parents and their children, with the author as their pro bono counsel, had achieved local control in the sense they and other San Diegans similarly situated were now free of a non-class status in a pending class action. They could now exercise the full range of their civil rights on a level playing field. It remained to be seen how the Board would respond to the following modifications in the integration plan they had sought, but which were not granted, in the Final Order:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Carlin |
Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District, |
|||||||||||||||||||
Board of Education v. Superior Court, 61 Cal.App.4th 411 (Feb.1998) |
||||||||||||||||||||
— Handbook: Challenge Five, pages 65 - 74 — |
||||||||||||||||||||
|