Parental Handbook
for Local Control of Education  /  Challenge Five
  
65

San Diegans Challenge Perpetual
Court Assignment of Pupils,
Emanating from Carlin v. Board of Education,
To Restore Local Control
According to the Constitution

PreviousNext

  United States Court of Appeals Upholds Proposition 209

On April 8, 1997, a Ninth Circuit Panel upheld the California Civil Rights Initiative (Proposition 209), adopted by Californians as Article I, Section 31, to their Constitution, providing in relevant part:

The State shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of... public education....

Coalition for Econ. Equity v. Wilson, 110 F.3d 1431, 1434 (9th Cir.1997)

Accordingly, Groundswell Intervenors prepared a fourth motion for an order to terminate jurisdiction, along with an order that the Board modify its integration program to comply with current constitutional standards. After a telephonic conference on July 14, 1997, Groundswell secured a meaningful open court hearing of the motion. Armstrong v. Manzo (1965), 380 U.S. 545,550,552.Next
 


Armstrong 

Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545 (1965)
 

Carlin  

Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District,
San Diego Superior Court No. 303800 (1967-1998)
San Diego, California
 

Coalition 

Coalition for Econ. Equity v. Wilson, 110 F.3d 1431 (9th Cir.1997)
 

         

Handbook: Challenge Five, pages 65 - 74 —

PreviousNext
  

Parental Handbook
For Parents Dedicated to Local Control
of Public Education of Children
According to the Constitution
by Elmer Enstrom, Jr.
Contents
Challenges of the 30-year Carlin affirmative action lawsuit:
an exemplar of citizens reasserting Constitutional rights.
  
© 1998-2006, 2013 Enstrom Foundation www.EnstromFoundation.org Bookmark and Share