Parental Handbook for Local Control of Education / Challenge Three |
51 | |||||||||||||||||||
Groundswell Intervenors Support |
||||||||||||||||||||
... Lee shifted gears and closed with a discussion of federalism and the efficient allocation of resources. Under Dowell, he said, school systems should be run by local governing bodies, and not federal courts. For 22 years, DCSS has been trying to obey the law, but now, due to circumstances beyond its control, it's being told it will have to continue under court supervision for an indefinite length of time. Under the Eleventh Circuit's opinion, Lee noted, his clients are looking to more busing and radical gerrymandering....Seven Civil Rights Groups file Amici Curiae Brief on Behalf of Respondents Pitts, Being the Class of Plaintiffs Who Brought the Desegregation Class Action An Amici Curiae brief was filed in support of the respondents Pitts, et al, a plaintiff-class of black students, by seven organizations, headed by the DeKalb County, Georgia, Branch of the NAACP, whose interest was stated as representing individuals throughout the nation who share a critical interest in desegregation of public school systems. The NAACP Amici Allegations in Support of Respondents' Class of Students were as follows:
Annexed to their brief as the Appendix is a document dated June 1991 entitled School Desegregation: A Social Science Statement. Among the many social scientists signing that statement were two who testified in the |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dowell |
Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1990) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Freeman |
Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 112 S.Ct. 1430 (1992) |
|||||||||||||||||||
— Handbook: Challenge Three, pages 45 - 54 — |
||||||||||||||||||||
|