Parental Handbook for Local Control of Education / Challenge One |
29 | |||||||||||||||||||
San Diego Parents Challenge |
||||||||||||||||||||
student intervenors, by improper state action; Groundswell Parents Meet First Challenge On December 12, 1980, at a spirited hearing in a courtroom filled by Groundswell supporters, their motion to intervene was granted, over objections by both the Carlin Class and the Board, and was formalized December 15. The attendance at this hearing by the now-Intervenors was followed by their next exercising the right of petition under the First Amendment. In furtherance of establishing their role in the case as persons, separate petitions were prepared for those (1) students, (2) taxpayers-voters, and (3) taxpayers-parents, residing in the District who objected to the proposed mandatory student assignments as a violation of their respective rights. Those rights had been asserted in the intervening complaint as noted above, and the petitions were drafted to fit the category of the persons signing them, such as this one for students:
District students signed 1,856 of the total of about 5,983 petitions presented by the Groundswell president to the Board on March 3, 1981, of which exemplars in each category were later made a part of the record in the Carlin case. Id., app.V. In the meantime, on December 22, 1980 (seven days after this intervention) the California Court of Appeal reversed the Crawford Superior Court, finding that the trial court's 1970 findings did not support
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Carlin |
Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District, |
|||||||||||||||||||
Crawford II |
Crawford v. Board of Education, 113 Cal.App.3d 633 (1980) |
|||||||||||||||||||
— Handbook: Challenge One, pages 23 - 31 — |
||||||||||||||||||||
|